Scope 3 reporting breaks at scale because most OEMs rely on estimated, API-based data instead of supplier-level emissions data. While estimates may work for disclosure, they fail when supply chains grow to hundreds of suppliers. Accurate, scalable Scope 3 reporting requires direct supplier data, automation, and enablement, not assumptions.
Understanding Scope 3 Reporting at Scale
Scope 3 emissions include all indirect emissions across a company’s value chain, from raw material sourcing and manufacturing to logistics and packaging. For OEMs, these emissions often account for over 70% of the total footprint.
At small scale, Scope 3 reporting is manageable. But as OEMs expand across geographies and supplier tiers, Scope 3 reporting challenges increase exponentially. The root cause is not lack of ambition, it is the way data is collected.
API-Based Data vs Supplier-Level Data
Most Scope 3 emissions reporting today relies on API-based or activity-based estimates. These methods apply average emissions factors based on spend categories or assumed activities.
Why API-based data fails at scale:
- It reflects averages, not real supplier performance
- It masks variations across suppliers and regions
- It cannot track improvement or reduction over time
In contrast, supplier-level data captures emissions from actual operations, production processes, fuel usage, logistics movements, and packaging choices. This data is essential for OEMs that want decision-grade Scope 3 emissions reporting, not just compliance-ready numbers.
Research published in npj Climate Action shows that Scope 3 inventories built on primary, supplier-level data are significantly more accurate than those relying on industry averages or spend-based proxies, reinforcing why estimated data fails at scale
The Scale Problem OEMs Face
Large OEMs typically manage 700–800 suppliers across Tier 1 alone. Manual data collection becomes unworkable, and estimated data becomes unreliable.
As a result:
- Sustainability teams chase data instead of reducing emissions
- Reports meet disclosure needs but fail operational goals
- Decarbonization strategies lack credible baselines
This is why Scope 3 reporting breaks when OEMs scale — the system was never designed for that level of complexity.
What Actually Works
Scalable Scope 3 reporting depends on three factors:
- Supplier-level data collected once, not repeatedly
- Automation to reduce human error and manual effort
- Supplier enablement, including training and simple tools
Evidence from Scientific Reports also indicates that digitally integrated supply chains achieve better carbon efficiency outcomes, largely due to improved data flow, automation, and collaboration across suppliers.
FAQs
Why is Scope 3 reporting difficult for OEMs?
Because emissions occur outside direct control, across hundreds of suppliers with different capabilities and systems.
Is API-based Scope 3 reporting inaccurate?
It is useful for high-level estimates but insufficient for tracking reductions or making operational decisions.
What is the best way to scale Scope 3 reporting?
Direct supplier-level data collection supported by automation and ongoing supplier enablement.
Conclusion
Scope 3 reporting does not fail because OEMs lack intent — it fails because estimated data cannot scale. OEMs that move beyond API-based assumptions to supplier-level, automated data systems unlock accurate reporting, credible compliance, and real decarbonization outcomes.